In This Edition

Prison murder trial moved to Carson City

At the Throttle

New Sand Mountain rules

Global warming worse than Al imagined

This Week's Cartoon
Thumbnail
About Us
Global warming worse than Al imagined
What would YOU be willing to sacrifice to save life on earth?


Global warming is for real, you know.

But that current hysterical claim by Al Gore, that we must take drastic steps to reduce green house gases or we face an eminent atmospheric boil-over is backed by very little hard, scientific data. The dramatic claim actually is based on theories supported by highly sophisticated computer models.

Those theories are credible. But they are not proven fact.

They certainly indicate we should closely monitor actual climate data for unusual changes. And the theory, alone, is sufficient reason to develop better alternatives to fossil fuels.

But "extreme" global warming is, nonetheless, more an Environmentalism conspiracy theory than proven, scientific fact.

Hollywood gave the former vice president an Oscar, placing his film, "An Inconvenient Truth," alongside other great science fiction movies where it belongs.

Nonetheless, the planet is warming over time. The few remains of the glaciers that once covered so much of the Northern Hemisphere are still melting. The sea level has continued to rise for the past 5,000 years.

Samples of core ice from Greenland have air molecules trapped in them from the distant past, allowing scientists to estimate air quality and temperatures from those bygone times. The samples have shown we are living in a relatively, and usual, stable climate period. But those samples also show it hasn't been that way for most of the time humans have existed on earth -- wide swings in temperature have occurred, sometimes only decades apart. And there's been a slow increase in temperature since before man discovered fire.

So the earth was warming before we became adept at polluting our air. Still, we must be contributing bunches to the problem, so by all means, let's continue our efforts to protect our air, water and ecosystems.

But we don't need to turn off the lights and move back into caves.

Sell a better light bulb than Edison's early technology and people will buy it. Sell a car that runs more economically on some alternate fuel source and people will buy it.

We're discovering smarter ways to be, using waste and recycling instead of less-efficient methods of living our lives.

Allow the government to subsidize new technologies, at the most. But calls for draconian measures to control CO2 emissions aren't warranted by the data. We don't need any eco-Nazi state to monitor and control our consumption and wastage.

People are becoming more aware and savvy. Consumers are demanding more products that don't ravage the planet's resources.

And that's a good thing. We're going to need every ounce of resource earth has because global warming is much, much more deadly than even ol' Al imagines, flying around in that private jet.

For some reason, all the climatologists, meteorologists, oceanographers and other test-tube jockeys have missed the real threat. But I took freshman science in high school, and have my own theory about global warming, honed over the past half century.

It's the sun.

Yeah, yeah, I know. Several top scientists already claim global warming is caused by nothing more than cycles of the sun. That's not what I mean.

It's worse.

My theory started back in 1956. Bell telephone sponsored a bunch of science shows on TV back then. One was called, "Our Mr. Sun."

Dr. Frank Baxter (I think he was a professor at UCLA or somewhere prestigious) talked with some funny cartoon characters and used some pretty decent special effects to explain everything science knew at that time about the sun.

He concluded that some day the sun would die. But he reassured the viewing public, that the sun would burn for millions of years yet.

Then he added the kicker: "Of course, no one knows for sure."

No one knows for sure? You mean the sun can just go poof any time it cares to?

My science teacher told me, "No." The sun will be around for a long time. "But no one knows for sure," he added.

Years later, I read new theories, that the sun would increase in heat and size and eventually incinerate the earth before it too expired.

None of this bothered me until Mr. Gore started going on about global warming.

Then I realized what was really happening. The sun is at the end of its life! We're seeing the beginning of the end. No one knew for sure, but I do. I've got to warn everyone.

The earth is doomed.

We've got to get off this planet and we don't have a lot of time to figure out how.

All of us can't be saved, of course. But enough can, so humans and other earth lifeforms can survive the coming solar meltdown.

We've got to build an ark -- a huge, moon-sized, interstellar space ship that can hold millions of people, selected for their genetic diversity, animals, plants and... good grief, we'll have to save samples of every living thing on earth. We'll need food, strategic minerals, water, oxygen... what a task!

And a ship like that is way beyond our technology. We'll need to unite and galvanize the entire world! We only have a couple of hundred years to develop the technologies before the sun gets real testy, and everything we've got will need to go into the project.

We'll need all the world's top space scientists -- all scientific research will have to be directed to building this space lifeboat and figuring out the closest star where we might find a new home.

This will be such a huge undertaking, it will require all of us to do without many of the simple things we've become accustomed to like fuel, food and medical treatment. Only the designated survivors and people necessary to the project should have full rations and medical care to avoid any waste.

The people who will be left behind -- the aged and sickly, the weak and disabled, people without the necessary skills or genetic makeup -- must sacrifice for the survival of the species. It will give a whole new meaning to “the meek shall inherit the earth.”

The environment won't matter anymore. We'll need to extract everything from the earth the survivors will need or might need. We'll need new factories, new industries. We can't waste resources protecting the earth while we suck it dry. It won't matter anyway: foul the water, foul the air, foul the land. Whatever it takes for us to save a vestige of earth's life before Sol fries the planet.

Earth is our home; our mother. But if we don't wring every last drop of resource out of it to escape, it will be our funeral pyre.

But people will have to be completely convinced that the end is near, or they won't make the needed sacrifices.

I've got to convince Al Gore of the danger. He can convince people that global warming is real. He can convince them global warming is dangerous and we've got to act now before it's too late.

Will he believe me without any evidence? Does he even believe the stuff he's pushing now or is it just some cynical, political ploy playing on the sympathies of the far-left environmental movement just for another shot at the Oval Office?

Of course he believes it. And I'll convince him of the even greater threat.

Fortunately, he's easily convinced. Back when he was vice president he thought Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and was seeking nuclear weapons.

Besides, my lack of evidence won't matter because the story sounds good and can spread worldwide panic... and it would make a heck of a movie.

Leave Your Comment 13 comment(s)
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Ely Times does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.
Sorry, comments have been closed.

Pat wrote on Apr 17, 2007 6:40 AM:

" Our Sun will, eventually, burn out it's fuel. Scientists believe, based on observations, that a yellow Sun like our, will burn all it's fuel and become a "Red Giant". During this process, all the inner planets will be destroyed and in fact all life on Earth will have long since been burnt off. Scientists predict that the Sun will decrease in solar radiance in the next 100 years. Look forward to the return of the "global cooling" scares of the '70's. But we can rest assured that some people, politicians and Govn'ts etc, will make lots of money out of scare taxes and carbon trading. Carbon trading between Europe and Asia in the last 12 months turned over A$10bil. Nice earner if you're involved. "

Pat wrote on Apr 17, 2007 6:34 AM:

" Anyone heard of the Medievil Warm Period? Temperatures warmer than what is prdicted, based on computer models, yet vastly less Co2? Carboniferous perod with Co2 8 - 9 times more than today, but no "evidence" of rapid warming/catastrophy? "

glanery bestus wrote on Apr 9, 2007 2:21 PM:

" Stupid...plain and simple. You need to study more. Has there been any any reports at all about the sun blowing up and destroying the world? If there were I would really like to see one. Otherwise i think you are completely insane or just a very imaginative 12 year old. Oh and by the way if people had to be sacrificed, just because you wrote this article doesn't mean you would survive. Don't start bringing other people down by saying they don't deserve to live. "

Boxorox wrote on Apr 6, 2007 5:36 AM:

" Computer models are like lab rats - only less reliable. At least with a lab rat, you can realistically control the inputs and measure the outputs. A computer model only accepts as inputs what the model creator understands as controllable variable. Climate has a huge number of variables, so the outputs are not a good indication of the real thing in the case of climate. "

Authur's Addendum wrote on Mar 24, 2007 7:55 PM:

" Gore is only one voice, certainly. But he's the one yesterday who told congressional committees we must cut back on CO2 emissions 90 percent by 2050. We can't destroy the entire world economy based on this unproven -- but not completely whacky -- theory. Theories are good. This is a good one, so it deserves more study and experimentation. Here's what I got from the UN report (or at least from a variety of news stories about the report). There is evidence the atmosphere is warming. There is strong belief among scientists that man is a major contributor. But there is no evidence the atmosphere is warming at an alarming rate. There is no evidence we are in eminent peril. Sea levels will not rise by feet, but by inches. There is little belief among scientists that anything humans can do will have any benefical effect for several hundred years. We can have a smaller carbon foot-print. We can recycle more. We can become more efficient in our use of energy. We've got the message. Government try to speed change faster than the market can bear will create serious, unintended consequences, more global inequities and strife. Gore's airplane, mansion and lifestyle show more than hyprocrisy. They show the mentality of the privileged classes. If world governments adopt these draconian measures, the underclasses will suffer most, while the Gores, Kennedys, Kerrys and, yes, the Bushes, will continue to be energy guzzlers. Ooops, forgot. The Bush ranch is energy efficient. It's the place in Tennessee that caused all the huff. The change over to ethanol is a good early indicator of unintended, negative consequences. Corn growers switching their production to ethanol in Mexico have gutted the masa supply in some regions. Peasants complain they can't afford their most-basic food supply. Wonder where they'll go to find jobs and food. I'm open to more data that global warming is threatening; that anything we do will can stop or slow it. But I've yet to see anything that nears reasonable doubt. At the moment, I'm not volunteering to use an erg less or pay a cent more until I see more fact and less hyperbole. The burden of proof is on those advocating immediate, drastic change. They're not even close. Kent Harper "

Tucker Poindexter wrote on Mar 24, 2007 2:55 PM:

" If you think computer models of severe climate and atmospheric change only postulates to theory then you are either quite stupid, or one of the many trying to put a lid on the real issue. Even if hard scientific data, which does exist, was only able to form a theory, why wouldnt you want to be on the safe side? Not only by ignoring it will we all suffer a hell on earth in the near future, so will every other form of life as we know it. The only thing to blame is our ignorance and artivles like this. "

Boxorox wrote on Mar 24, 2007 1:57 PM:

" "...whether it's real or not," you say. So we should devote huge amounts of effort and resources to FIX something even if it's not really there or, as is more the real point, beyond our realm of influence? Shall we start calling you and those who think like you Don Quixote? "

Thomas wrote on Mar 24, 2007 11:00 AM:

" Whether global warming is real or not, we need to look at it at all directions and fix them all to make sure we don't make a mistake and our children have to pay for it.... Come on lets put all of our ideas together to fight this thing. Whether it is real or not doesn't matter, the world is heating up and we need to try to fix it. "

Boxorox wrote on Mar 24, 2007 9:52 AM:

" Trump the hype with an ever bigger hype! Yeah, what a splendid idea! Be more Al-Gore-like than Al Gore. It might be the only way to save everything we hold near and dear. The point is clear though. There is no emergency to climate change. Just remember that the earth is historically, in geologic terms, a harsh place to live. We've been lucky over the past 11,000 years for the most part and have been lulled into believing that we belong on this planet, allowed by some sort of devine right, to continue living a benign existence without having to worry about the greater forces of nature which might someday accidentally wind up killing us off. Not that global warming stands a snowball's chance in the microwave of threating our collective existence, but the clamor over this issue is causing hords of children throughout the modern world to worry needlessly about it. We have bigger probelms to solve than to focus so intently on a few inches of sea lvel increase. In the balance, we stand to gain more from overall warming. Take note of recent reports of improved northest Arctic shipping 5 months per year, new opportunities to expand agriculture in the North and even oil exploration in Artic areas (yeah, I can hear the background reaction to that thought--So What?). "

Dr. Jorgensen wrote on Mar 24, 2007 9:07 AM:

" This is just another scare tactic to allow politicians to tax and regulate us so they can make more money from lobbyists. Another, cheap political trick with no scientific basis. Dishusting so many ignorant people can't see that, but they actually put faith in politicians, that is sad and speaks to the typical Americans' intelligence. "

Robin Green wrote on Mar 24, 2007 8:59 AM:

" This article begins with a number of excellent examples of misinterpretation or misrepresentation of the science of climate change. It engages in ad hominen attacks against Al Gore, who is but one of many advocates of a major change to our lifestyles to avert a climate catastrophe. It then describes an alternate global warming theory that the author himself makes clear is absurd, and cooked up by someone with a single high school science course to his credit, namely that global warming is caused by an expanding sun. This patently absurd theory is an obvious attempt at discrediting the very real and worrisome issue of climate change by association. No one is talking about saving life on earth. Life will go on regardless. It just won't be nice for humans, or for millions of other species affected by climate change or by other effects of increased greenhouse gas concentrations such as ocean acidification. We'll be hungry: there will be droughts and floods leading to crop failures (world grain consumption has outpaced production for six of the last seven years); acidification and warming of the oceans will lead to more fisheries failures. We'll be thirsty: glacier meltwaters that provide water for billions of humans (such as the American and Canadian west) won't flow once the glaciers have melted (reduced river flow is already a reality in western North America and other areas of the world where glacier meltwaters produce the bulk of river flows). We'll be hot: heatwaves in Europe killed over 50,000 people in 2003, and the ten hottest years on record occurred in the last 15 years. We'll be lonely: changing climate is disrupting the breeding schedules of animals, leading some young to be hatched or born before their food source becomes available, and the survivability of plants, which cannot move to a cooler or wetter location when their location turns hot and dry. The real question is, what would you be willing to sacrifice to make life on earth worth living? "

Mike Waring wrote on Mar 23, 2007 9:35 PM:

" I just cant believe how arrogant our politicicans are! The people need do much more protesting wake these leaders up! Before we all shivel up like crumpets! It is Autumn in Australia now with 31C and 88% humidity! "

Terry Mead wrote on Mar 23, 2007 7:40 PM:

" Al Gore is full of...hot air among other things! The sky is not falling! "