In This Edition

Governor gets close view of Ely State Prison

Rodders announce winners of annual car show

Shhh! Don't tell anyone UNLV was you know where

As We See It

This Week's Cartoon
Thumbnail
About Us
Reid says he has hush-hush plan to scuttle the coal plants
PAHRUMP -- Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said last Wednesday that he is not going to divulge his battle strategy for stopping development of three coal-fired power plants in Nevada.


"We've got plans. I'm not going to telegraph my punches. We've got a month-by-month process," Reid, D-Nev., said after speaking to about 200 constituents at the Bob Rudd Community Center in Pahrump.

Reid addressed a list of national policy issues along with energy during his speech to a friendly crowd of graybeards, retirees in shorts and a few younger voters. But the Nevada Democrat focused on his opposition to coal-fired power plants and his support of renewable energy.

He first publicly opposed the Nevada coal plants in a letter that was made public on July 26.

The legislative leader said he felt morally compelled to oppose coal power.

"I sat around, I believe, far too long and did nothing about it," Reid said. "I just couldn't in good conscience keep my mouth shut."

Reid complained that one of the plants will burn 7 million tons of coal yearly, polluting national parks, Nevada and Utah. The power plants also would emit large quantities carbon dioxide, which leads to global warming.

Sierra Pacific Resources, the holding company for Nevada Power Co. and Sierra Pacific Power Co., is developing one of the three coal plants at Ely.

The utility company plans to spend $3.8 billion building the coal-fired Ely Energy Center and a transmission line that will link the plant to Northern and Southern Nevada. Independent power company LS Power also proposes to build a coal-fired plant at Ely, and Sithe Global Power wants to build one near Mesquite.

Reid noted that the utility company complained about his comments, but he offered a suggestion.

"Nevada Power, instead of standing around whining about this, should develop some alternative energy," he said.

Reid said the utility took the "easy way" and decided: "Let's build coal plants. It's cheaper."

The senator contends that Nevada can obtain enough new power generation from renewable power such as solar, wind and geothermal resources in the form of hot underground water.

Large building owners could build combined heat and power systems that create both heat and power from a single source, he said. Consumers could take steps to reduce power consumption and install solar power systems to generate some of their needs, according to Reid's proposal.

Utility and energy industry executives say renewable energy can only help meet demand for electricity. Industry executives argue that Nevada also needs to continue building plants that burn fossil fuels, particularly coal, to keep up with growing demand for electricity.

Industry leaders say Nevada is already too reliant on natural gas for generation and that gas prices often fluctuate wildly, causing rate increases.

Reid also addressed executives in the electric power business, including representatives of Sierra Pacific Resources, on Saturday at the Clean Energy Summit in Reno. Reid and the Economic Development Authority of Western Nevada hosted the one-day conference. Gov. Jim Gibbons, who supports the Ely coal plant, also is scheduled to participate.

Reid also is taking his message directly to Nevada voters at town hall meetings on renewable energy and opposing coal-fired power plants. The meeting in Pahrump is the first of several town hall meetings Reid will use as a way to promote renewable energy, spokesman Jon Summers said.

Meanwhile, the Public Utilities Commission last week discussed backup plans for developing a new unit at Sierra Pacific Power's coal-fired Valmy plant -- if the Ely Energy Center is not built.

If the coal-fired plant is stalled or stopped, Nevada Power's contingency plans call for building a 1,200-megawatt, gas-fired plant although this was not discussed by commissioners.

Commissioner Rebecca Wagner last week said the Ely Energy Center project might fail, but she said she was not reacting to Reid's letter.

"My biggest fear is not having a reliable source of power for ratepayers," Wagner said. "We have to have a viable back-up plant."

State consumer advocate Eric Witkoski said Nevada might be able to meet its growing power needs with renewable energy projects instead of coal-fired plants -- if the state is able to develop wind power along with solar and geothermal power.

Michael Yackira, chief executive officer of Sierra Pacific Resources, rejected Reid's criticism of the company's renewable energy program.

The Nevada utility company is a "leader in renewable energy."

The utility company, Yackira said, will have more solar power per person than any other electric power company in the nation with the completion of a solar power plant late this year at Nellis Air Force Base.

Leave Your Comment 22 comment(s)
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Ely Times does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.
Sorry, comments have been closed.

Arizona henry wrote on Dec 2, 2007 8:35 AM:

" Harry Reid is a lying fool. He was paid to say this garbage. Is his money coming from th Sierra Club, the Nature Conservancy, or Urban interests from las Vegas or Reno. He is fooling no one with his b--l s--t. "

Karen M wrote on Aug 29, 2007 12:06 PM:

" How much more are you willing to pay in power costs in order to not be dependent on coal, double or even triple what you now pay? Ask Reid what the cost to consumers would be for his "all renewable plan". Legislators are good at putting words out there but not backing them up with actual cost numbers. "

Karen M wrote on Aug 29, 2007 12:01 PM:

" If Reid is such a proponent of solar power, why doesn't he use solar power at his home? Is this just for everyone else and not him? "

Sam wrote on Aug 28, 2007 9:41 PM:

" Citizen's right, it doesn't add up. Also, make sure you add up the real cost of coal, after federal (that's you and me paying taxes) subsidies and long term environmental effects (that's our kids and grandkids). In the end, I'd pay a little, maybe a lot more, to clean up our energy production methods and insure independence from the disaster prone middle-east without pumping mercury and pollutants into the air. "

Concerned Citizen wrote on Aug 28, 2007 11:40 AM:

" If we don't get our power from coal now, where do we get it? Other than the Hoover Dam. How can you say we don't have a base already if we are all currently supplied with electricity? "

beenthere wrote on Aug 28, 2007 9:57 AM:

" Concerned Citizen: You are oh so right!! We have coal plants now...all 2 of them...one in the north and one in the south. If you actually believe that these 2 plants supply the base load of power in this state, then I would suggest that perhaps you invest some time in a math class. Given the unprecedented growth in this state, it is virtually impossible for the power production of these 2 plant to equal the population growth. I would be surprised if combined the 2 coal plants in this state produce more than 1200 megawatts of power and that doesn't take into consideration that part of that generation capacity is earmaked for the partners in the power plants. Renewable energy is definitely something that the future will bring, but at the present time it isn't cost effective based on what you get for what you spend. Take the time to try to understand the ramifications of Harry's proposal.........HIGHER COSTS!!! "

Concerned Citizen wrote on Aug 27, 2007 5:01 PM:

" Don't we already have coal fired plants as our base power supply, isn't that what we're using right now? If so, we've got our base. Let's supplement it with clean renewable energy. "

Renee wrote on Aug 27, 2007 2:39 PM:

" Harry Reid's belief that renewable energy should be developed to replace coal fired energy is ignorant and irresponsible. Renewable resources are an excellent supplement but are too costly and not reliable enough to solely supply the state. Is the power company taking the cheapest way out? You bet, because all of the money they spend on developing more energy will be passed on to us, in the form of higher power bills. Generation in Nevada relies heavily on natural gas which is becoming a desirable and unstable commodity. All of those rate increases we see in our power bills, they're due to rising fuel costs, primarily natural gas. It makes sense to build a coal fired plant in which the market for coal is much more stable. A point worth noting.. the transmission lines that will be built as a result of this new power plant will allow wind farms along those transmission lines to become economically feasible. Thus building this plant would actually allow our state to develop the renewable resources Harry Reid is whining about but at an affordable cost to the public. "

Art wrote on Aug 24, 2007 9:48 PM:

" "Reid said the utility took the 'easy way' and decided: 'Let's build coal plants. It's cheaper.'" Hair-brained Harry doesn't know what he's talking about. The cheapest and easiest to build electric power plants are gas turbine. Spend a little more and you can have a "combined cycle" gas turbine plant, the highest efficiency thermal power plants available. The question is how long can you operate the gas plants? We only have a 5 to 7 year reserve of natural gas in the USA (not counting Alaska). Natural gas exists in large quantities in Russia, Iran, Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Not the best of friends. They may demand real money for their gas some time in the future, not our fiat currency. And then where would that leave us? "

Wynon wrote on Aug 24, 2007 6:39 PM:

" Concerned Citizen makes a good point...why not put the solar panels on top of the million houses they have in Vegas? They have 200 square miles of mall roofing alone! I also commend Reid for his efforts; well done sir. "

susan wrote on Aug 24, 2007 8:38 AM:

" It seems a little hypocritical for Mr. Reid to be so concerned about Utah's air quality when at the same time he doesn't seem to be too concerned about effects of groundwater piping on the same population of people. "

Jeremy wrote on Aug 24, 2007 7:31 AM:

" Having had some experience with the power industry, I am always a little frustrated with calls to replace coal fired power plants with renewable energy. While it would be absolutely wonderful to have a clean alternative to coal power, there simply isn't one that can duplicate the characteristics of coal power. Wind power tends to be generated at certain times of the day, so you can't rely on it for your base power, or the general level of power you need almost constantly. Geothermal power, although it sounds very promising, has never been proven feasible. The corrosion that occurs makes it nearly unworkable. Solor power surely has promise for the future, but in order to generate the kind of power needed to replace coal, you would need huge fields of solar cells, and everything from dust to sand to falling objects can damage those cells or at least cover them so their efficiency goes down. Hydro power would be great if we had sufficient water in the west to make it work, which we don't. Nuclear could replace coal, and it would be initially cleaner, but as everyone in Nevada knows, eventually the waste has to go somewhere, and inevitably those on the east coast find somewhere in the west to dump it. I'm sorry, but if Harry Reid is going to scuttle this project, he better be offering some fairly detailed descriptions of what renewable energy he supposes can replace the electricity generation that the coal fired plants can produce. If not, then I have no other choice but to believe that he is merely pandering to environmentalist groups who don't want us to have any power, because then we might actually live our lives how we want to, rather than how they want us to. "

Anonemouse wrote on Aug 24, 2007 6:55 AM:

" Independence from foreign oil? The only way that will ever happen is by utilizing the most abundant natural resource we have available in this country C-O-A-L!!!! If a lot of the folks here in Nevada were serious about stopping global warming then they should all pack their bags and go back to where ever they came from instead of trying to refrigerate the southern Nevada desert to make it hospitable enough to live in. That way there would be plenty of electricity for everyone else and no need to build such a blemish on the desolate frozen northern Nevada. "

Concerned Citizen wrote on Aug 24, 2007 6:49 AM:

" I commend senator reid for his efforts to stop the power plants. And I don't think they would be planning on covering steptoe valley with solar panels, if they take the renewable energy route such plants would be built in more remote areas, such as along the road to tonopah, or near area 51. Also think of the amount of coal they would be burning in the plant to equal 200 square miles of land, that's a lot of coal that will be polluting our now clean air. I am in support of Reid for his opposition to these plants. "

Anti Reid wrote on Aug 23, 2007 7:53 PM:

" Hey Randal, Just to quote you, steptoe is covered in solar panels to power Vegas. "

Randal wrote on Aug 23, 2007 2:29 PM:

" Very well said Northern Nevada Resident. I joked once before, Reid won't be happy until all of Steptoe is covered over in Solar Panels. "

Northern Nevada Resident wrote on Aug 23, 2007 2:27 PM:

" Sen. Reid: The technology just isn't there and isn't cost effective for Solar, Wind and Geothermal to produce the amount of electricity needed to satisfy the demand for an ever-expanding state. Please stick to getting our men and women out of Iraq and making us less dependent on foreign oil. And don't forget health care and education. Let Sierra Pacific worry about generating electricity. Thanks! "

Anti Reid wrote on Aug 23, 2007 1:47 PM:

" I wonder who he met with? very well said chev3100 and golfer. harry dont have the you no what to face us. "

GolferDude wrote on Aug 23, 2007 9:24 AM:

" I stopped by the Ely Energy Center office and found out that a wind farm the size of their plant here would take up more than 200 square miles. Think about that. How many of us would like to see most of our valley covered with those noisy bird killers? Dirty Harry doesn't talk about that, does he? And, they told me that they would still have to build a gas plant to back up the turbines when it wasn't blowing. Did the wind blow last night? I don't think so. Is the wind blowing hard enough right now? I don't think so. "

Chev3100 wrote on Aug 23, 2007 9:07 AM:

" Harry came to town yesterday, was too much of a coward to face the whole town. Flew in, had a secret meeting with a few "invited guests", and flew back out before he could get the real opinion from the man on the street. This guy needs to grow a pair and at least face us like a man while he is trying to cut our throats!! "

Harry Collins wrote on Aug 23, 2007 6:35 AM:

" This is typical Harry Reid, travels the country whining about the power plants, but never bothers to come to White Pine county to get the opinion of the people who will be affected most by the plants. "

Randal wrote on Aug 22, 2007 2:42 PM:

" I wonder what Reid thinks is expensive if $3.8 Billion for ONE plant is cheap. And for a Public Official he sure is secretive about his plans. If he wants people like me to back or trust him he has to let us know what he is thinking or planning. My bet is he has nothing and is flying by the seat of his pants hoping to stall the project until nothing at all is viable (including solar, geothermal & wind), using as it's known in Washington a Filibuster. "